Write Erasmus+ proposals that are built to win.

FundyBee researches your idea against funded projects and live policy, drafts it straight into the official application forms, and lets you write side by side with your partners. Then an agentic review reads it the way an evaluator would, long before you submit.

Decentralized and centralized actions The real application forms Agentic QA review
Next KA2 round 1 Oct 2026 17:00 CET
Cooperation partnerships (KA220 & KA210), submitted to your National Agency.
fundybee.eu / proposal
MK NV GS
3 editing
Relevance · Needs analysis Fundability 76
Describe the needs your project addresses

Adult educators across the three partner regions report low confidence in using AI tools with learners. Only 28% feel equipped to teach basic AI literacy, while demand from migrant adults keeps climbing

FundyBee is drafting this section…
+4 rel.
QA gate before submit Fundability 76
Eligibility
Priorities
76 Scoring
Researching your idea
18 sources analysed
Fundability
76 → 84

Most proposals are turned down for things a review would have caught.

Thin evidence, vague objectives, a partnership that looks lopsided on paper. None of it is hard to fix once you can see it. FundyBee shows you while there is still time to change it, instead of in a rejection letter a year later.

70
The score out of 100 your application has to clear to win funding.
4
Award criteria, each weighted and checked against its minimum as you write.
2
Families of actions covered, both the decentralized and the centralized ones.
€149
Flat, per proposal. No subscription, and never a slice of your grant.
The platform

Research it, write it together, review it.

Three things a strong Erasmus+ bid needs, in one place: real research behind the idea, every partner writing the same document, and an honest review before it leaves your hands.

1Research and draft

Start from your idea, land on the real form

Describe the project in your own words. FundyBee digs through funded projects, policy and evidence, then writes your draft straight into the official sections, kept inside the page limits and pointed at the criteria that earn points.

  • Research grounded in real funded work, not a generic guess.
  • Missing sources show up early, while you can still find them.
Relevance · Needs analysis Co-writing
Tighten this for the digital priority. It reads thin.
Reframed it around the 2026 digital-readiness priority and tied each need to your target group. One figure still needs a source before it can score.
Relevance, +4 expected
Ask FundyBee to improve this section…
Proposal · Drafting All changes saved
Project summary
Partnership and cooperation
Impact and dissemination
Project design and implementation
MK NV GS 3 partners editing now
+ Invite partner
2Collaborate

Invite your partners and write it together

Bring every partner organisation into the same proposal. Each one opens the sections it owns and writes in real time, you see who is working where, and the coordinator always holds the current version.

  • One living document, not a file bouncing between inboxes.
  • Give each partner their own access and their own sections.
3Agentic QA review

An agent reads it the way an evaluator would

When the draft is ready, FundyBee runs a full review of its own. It checks eligibility and your chosen priorities, scores every section against the official rules, questions claims that have nothing behind them, and hands back the fixes worth the most points first.

  • Eligibility, priorities and scoring, checked in that order.
  • Every flag points to the exact section holding you back.
Agentic review 3 passes complete
Eligibility
Partners, countries and tier all valid
Priorities
Your priority runs through the whole bid
!
Scoring
2 claims need evidence before they score
Coverage

Decentralized or centralized, same workspace.

Whether your application goes to a National Agency or to Brussels, FundyBee loads the matching form, the right page limits and the right scoring rules. You write in the correct structure from the first line.

Decentralized actions
Run by your National Agency
  • Learning mobility projects (KA1)
  • Cooperation partnerships (KA220)
  • Small-scale partnerships (KA210)
  • Sector forms for schools, VET, adult education, higher education and youth
Centralized actions
Assessed by EACEA, submitted via the EU portal
  • Capacity building projects
  • Larger European cooperation projects
  • Networks, alliances and Jean Monnet actions
  • Portal admissibility and annex rules enforced
How it works

Three phases, one straight line to submit.

Begin with an idea, build a scored draft with your partners, and only submit once the review comes back clean. The same path whether you start fresh or bring in last year's draft.

PHASE 01

Research your idea

Tell FundyBee what you want to do. It researches the policy, the evidence and what evaluators reward, then helps you shape a fundable angle before you touch the form.

IdeateDeep research
PHASE 02

Draft and co-write

Fill the real form section by section, with your partners writing alongside you. Add the budget and timeline, and watch your score move as the draft takes shape.

Co-writeLive score
PHASE 03

Review and submit

Run the agentic review, clear what it finds, then submit through your own login. FundyBee fills the form and stops. You read it over and press submit.

QA reviewYou submit
The QA review, up close

Watch a draft go from 62 to 84.

A number on its own only makes you anxious. The review ranks every fix by the points it is worth, so you spend your last week on the changes that actually move the score.

62 / 100
Below the 70 pass line
Relevance15 / 25
Project design17 / 30
Partnership13 / 20
Impact15 / 25
84 / 100
Above the pass line, competitive
Relevance22 / 25
Project design24 / 30
Partnership17 / 20
Impact21 / 25
Ranked by points, not alphabet
1
Back the needs analysis with cited data
Relevance · needs analysis
+6
2
Make the objectives specific and measurable
Project design · objectives
+5
3
Add monitoring and dissemination to the plan
Project design · implementation
+4
4
Give every partner a distinct, real role
Partnership · cooperation
+3
5
Show impact that outlives the project
Impact · sustainability
+3
Pricing

One flat price for the whole proposal.

No subscription to remember to cancel, no success fee. Next to an Erasmus+ grant worth six figures, a co-pilot that tells you your score before you submit is the cheapest line in the budget.

Per proposal
€149 flat

One proposal, from the first idea to an attended submit. No per-seat licence.

  • Research, drafting and the full QA review
  • Unlimited revisions and re-runs
  • Every partner in one shared workspace
  • Attended submission into your own login
  • Never a percentage of your grant
Start a proposal
If it doesn't pass, the next round is on us

Work through the review's prioritized fixes and if your draft still sits below the pass line, you don't pay for the next attempt.

How that compares
Grant consultant€3,000+
Generic AI writerNo score, no rules
FundyBee€149, full workspace
Questions

The things coordinators ask first.

Which Erasmus+ actions does FundyBee cover?
Both the decentralized actions run by National Agencies, like mobility and cooperation partnerships, and the centralized actions assessed by EACEA and submitted through the EU portal. You pick the action and FundyBee loads the right form and the right rules.
What does the agentic QA review actually do?
It reads your draft the way an evaluator would. It checks eligibility and your chosen priorities, scores each section against the official criteria, flags claims that have no source, and gives you a short list of fixes ordered by the points they are worth.
How does writing with partners work?
You invite each partner organisation into the same proposal. Everyone opens the sections they own and writes at the same time, the coordinator sees every change, and nothing ends up stranded in a stray email attachment.
Does FundyBee submit the proposal for me?
No. It prepares everything and fills the official form inside a session you have logged into yourself, then it stops. You review each field and press submit. The account and the decision stay yours.
How much does it cost?
A flat €149 per proposal, covering research, drafting, partner collaboration and the full QA review with unlimited re-runs. No subscription, and no share of your grant.
Where does my data live?
In an EU-hosted workspace, handled under GDPR. We never keep your login credentials or your two-factor codes.

See your score before the assessors do.

One proposal, the full workspace, your partners alongside you. You stay in control all the way to submit.

Start a proposal, €149

The platform for researching, writing and reviewing Erasmus+ proposals, decentralized and centralized, with your whole consortium in one place.

© 2026 FundyBee. All rights reserved.

FundyBee is an independent tool, not affiliated with or endorsed by the European Commission or any National Agency. The proposal, the account and the decision to submit stay entirely yours.